0 Comments
| Intel Xeon 5138 vs Pentium E5200 |
Released December, 2006
Intel Xeon 5138
- 2.13 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon 5138
![]() | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W |
VS
Released July, 2008
Intel Pentium E5200
- 2.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Pentium E5200
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.5 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.78 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.9 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 2 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 52.81W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.78 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | More than 75% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.9 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 85% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Jul, 2008 | vs | Dec, 2006 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 70.8 °C | Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature |
Features Key features of the Xeon 5138 vs Pentium E5200
clock speed
Xeon 5138
2.13 GHz
Pentium E5200
2.5 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon 5138
4 MB
Pentium E5200
2 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Xeon 5138
2.13 GHz
Pentium E5200
3.78 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Xeon 5138
2.13 GHz
Pentium E5200
3.9 GHz
TDP
Xeon 5138
35W
Pentium E5200
65W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon 5138 | vs | Pentium E5200 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 800 MHz |
details | Xeon 5138 | vs | Pentium E5200 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 228,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 8 | 12 | |
Voltage range | 1 - 1.5V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 70.8°C | Unknown - 74.1°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 3.78 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.13 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.13 GHz | 3.78 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon 5138 ![]() | Intel Pentium E5200 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $72 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium E5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Pentium E5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $72 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs Pentium E5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$117 | $72 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E4500 vs Pentium E5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E6300 vs Pentium E5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$167 | $72 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E6550 vs Pentium E5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E6600 vs Pentium E5200 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||