Winner
Intel Core i5 2450M
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 2450M based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.
See full details Intel Xeon 5133 vs Core i5 2450M |
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Xeon 5133
- 2.2 GHz
- Dual core
4.8 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon 5133
 | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
| | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
VS
Released January, 2012
Intel Core i5 2450M
- 2.5 GHz
- Dual core
7.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core i5 2450M
| | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
| | Much better performance per watt 19.45 pt/W | | Higher clock speed 2.5 GHz |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5133 vs 2450M among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 7.6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 19.45 pt/W | vs | 2.03 pt/W | More than 9.5x better performance per watt | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,403 | vs | 862 | Around 65% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 3,403 | vs | 1,598 | Around 2.2x better PassMark score | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Slightly lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 32.5W | Around 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 9.64 $/year | More than 10% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 35.04 $/year | More than 10% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 5133 vs Core i5 2450M
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon 5133 | vs | Core i5 2450M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 771 | |||
| rPGA 988B | |||
| BGA 1023 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Xeon 5133 | vs | Core i5 2450M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,300 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 40W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 9.64 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 35.04 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.03 pt/W | 19.45 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 32.5W | 28.44W | |
 Intel Xeon 5133  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 2450M Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $99 | $130 | |
| 2450M vs 3210M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $99 | ||
| 2450M vs 4300M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $99 | ||
| 2450M vs 250 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $99 | $225 | |
| 2450M vs 3230M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $99 | $250 | |
| 2450M vs 2520M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $99 | $65 | |
| 2450M vs 2350M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $99 | $80 | |
| 2450M vs 2330M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
