CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5133 vs 2450M among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i5 2450M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 2450M  based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon 5133

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 5133

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Front view of Intel Core i5 2450M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2450M

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better performance per watt 19.45 pt/W vs 2.03 pt/W More than 9.5x better performance per watt
Higher clock speed 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,403 vs 862 Around 65% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 3,403 vs 1,598 Around 2.2x better PassMark score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Slightly lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 32.5W Around 15% lower typical power consumption
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 9.64 $/year More than 10% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 35.04 $/year More than 10% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 5133 vs Core i5 2450M

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon 5133
1,598

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon 5133  vs
Core i5 2450M 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 2.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 771
rPGA 988B
BGA 1023

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Xeon 5133  vs
Core i5 2450M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 4 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 3000
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,300 MHz

power consumption

TDP 40W 35W
Annual home energy cost 9.64 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 35.04 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 2.03 pt/W 19.45 pt/W
Typical power consumption 32.5W 28.44W
Intel Xeon 5133
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 2450M
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus