Winner
Intel Core i5 2450M
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 2450M based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.
See full details | Intel Xeon 5133 vs Core i5 2450M |
![]() | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much better performance per watt 19.45 pt/W | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.5 GHz |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
7.6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much better performance per watt | 19.45 pt/W | vs | 2.03 pt/W | More than 9.5x better performance per watt | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,403 | vs | 862 | Around 65% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better PassMark score | 3,403 | vs | 1,598 | Around 2.2x better PassMark score | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 32.5W | Around 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 9.64 $/year | More than 10% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 35.04 $/year | More than 10% lower annual commercial energy cost |
summary | Xeon 5133 | vs | Core i5 2450M |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
rPGA 988B | |||
BGA 1023 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Xeon 5133 | vs | Core i5 2450M |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,300 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 40W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 9.64 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 35.04 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.03 pt/W | 19.45 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 32.5W | 28.44W |
Intel Xeon 5133 ![]() | Intel Core i5 2450M ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$99 | $130 | |
2450M vs 3210M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$99 | ||
2450M vs 4300M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$99 | ||
2450M vs 250 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$99 | $225 | |
2450M vs 3230M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$99 | $250 | |
2450M vs 2520M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$99 | $65 | |
2450M vs 2350M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$99 | $80 | |
2450M vs 2330M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||