Intel Xeon 5133 vs AMD Athlon II X2 245 |
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Xeon 5133
- 2.2 GHz
- Dual core
5.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon 5133
 | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
| | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 | | Significantly lower typical power consumption 32.5W |
VS
Released July, 2009
AMD Athlon II X2 245
- 2.9 GHz
- Dual core
5.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon II X2 245
| | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | | Higher clock speed 2.9 GHz |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5133 vs 245 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | AMD Athlon II X2 245CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 2 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 32.5W | vs | 52.81W | Around 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 9.64 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | Around 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 35.04 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.9 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 5133 vs Athlon II X2 245
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon 5133 | vs | Athlon II X2 245 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 771 | |||
| AM3 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 40W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 9.64 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 35.04 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.03 pt/W | 1.73 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 32.5W | 52.81W | |
details | Xeon 5133 | vs | Athlon II X2 245 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
| Voltage range | 1.15 - 1.25V | 0.85 - 1.4V | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 2,000 MHz | |
 Intel Xeon 5133  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon II X2 245 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| 3220 vs 245 | ||
 | VS | |
| $150 | ||
| 2100 vs 245 | ||
 | VS | |
| $145 | ||
| E8400 vs 245 | ||
 | VS | |
| 250 vs 245 | ||
 | VS | |
| 240 vs 245 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | ||
| E7500 vs 245 | ||
 | VS | |
| BE-2450 vs 245 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9420 vs 6200U | ||
