CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5133 vs 245 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD Athlon II X2 245

AMD Athlon II X2 245

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon 5133

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 5133

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly lower typical power consumption 32.5W vs 52.81W Around 40% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 9.64 $/year vs 15.66 $/year Around 40% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 35.04 $/year vs 56.94 $/year Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon II X2 245

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II X2 245

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 30% higher clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 5133 vs Athlon II X2 245

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon 5133  vs
Athlon II X2 245 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 2.9 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 771
AM3

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 40W 65W
Annual home energy cost 9.64 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 35.04 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 2.03 pt/W 1.73 pt/W
Typical power consumption 32.5W 52.81W

details

Xeon 5133  vs
Athlon II X2 245 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 4 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Voltage range 1.15 - 1.25V 0.85 - 1.4V

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 2,000 MHz
Intel Xeon 5133
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II X2 245
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus