Winner
AMD Athlon II X2 245
CPUBoss recommends the AMD Athlon II X2 245 based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details | Intel Xeon 5133 vs AMD Athlon II X2 245 |
![]() | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 32.5W |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.9 GHz |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
5 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| ![]() | AMD Athlon II X2 245CPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 2 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 32.5W | vs | 52.81W | Around 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 9.64 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | Around 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 35.04 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.9 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 30% higher clock speed |
summary | Xeon 5133 | vs | Athlon II X2 245 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
AM3 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 40W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 9.64 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 35.04 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.03 pt/W | 1.73 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 32.5W | 52.81W |
details | Xeon 5133 | vs | Athlon II X2 245 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 1.15 - 1.25V | 0.85 - 1.4V | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
Intel Xeon 5133 ![]() | AMD Athlon II X2 245 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
3220 vs 245 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
E8400 vs 245 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
250 vs 245 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
E7500 vs 245 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
5000+ vs 245 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Q6600 vs 245 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
4400+ vs 245 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||