CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5130 vs 2600K among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 2600K 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 2600K  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i7 2600K

Intel Core i7 2600K

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon 5130

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 5130

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 114.2W 2.2x lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 41.8 $/year 2.7x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 111.78 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i7 2600K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 2600K

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz 70% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 12,823 vs 1,897 More than 6.8x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 5.05 GHz vs 2.54 GHz Around 2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,920 vs 772 Around 2.5x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better PassMark score 8,494 vs 1,379 Around 6.2x better PassMark score
Much better performance per watt 7.53 pt/W vs 1.45 pt/W Around 5.2x better performance per watt
More threads 8 vs 2 6 more threads
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Jun, 2006 Release date over 4 years later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.76 GHz vs 2.59 GHz Around 85% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Higher Maximum operating temperature 72.6 °C vs 65 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 5130 vs Core i7 2600K

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 5130
3,790
Core i7 2600K
11,563

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 5130
1,098

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 5130
80,600 MB/s
Core i7 2600K
2,500,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 5130
1,897
Core i7 2600K
12,823

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 5130
3,212
Core i7 2600K
13,916

GeekBench

Xeon 5130
3,212
Core i7 2600K
16,706

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon 5130
1,379

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon 5130  vs
Core i7 2600K 
Clock speed 2 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 95W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 41.8 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 111.78 $/year
Performance per watt 1.45 pt/W 7.53 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 114.2W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Xeon 5130  vs
Core i7 2600K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 8
L2 cache 4 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 291,000,000 995,000,000
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 6 34
Voltage range 1 - 1.5V 0.85 - 1.45V
Operating temperature Unknown - 65°C Unknown - 72.6°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.54 GHz 5.05 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.59 GHz 4.76 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.54 GHz 5.05 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 3000
Latest DirectX N/A 10.x
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 850 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,350 MHz
3DMark06 N/A 5,275
Intel Xeon 5130
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 2600K
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus