CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5130 vs 2350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Opteron 2350 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Opteron 2350  based on its performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon 5130

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 5130

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.54 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 60.94W Around 15% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.59 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 65.7 $/year Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 18.07 $/year Around 15% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 2350

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2350

Report a correction
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Newer Sep, 2007 vs Jun, 2006 Release date over 1 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 5130 vs Opteron 2350

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon 5130
1,379
Opteron 2350
2,820

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon 5130  vs
Opteron 2350 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 771
F

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 75W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 18.07 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 65.7 $/year
Performance per watt 1.45 pt/W 1.54 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 60.94W

details

Xeon 5130  vs
Opteron 2350 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 4 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 2 2
Clock multiplier 6 10
Voltage range 1 - 1.5V 1 - UnknownV
Operating temperature Unknown - 65°C 0 - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.54 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.59 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.54 GHz 2 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 1,333 MHz 1,000 MHz
Intel Xeon 5130
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 2350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus