Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon 5113

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 5113

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Front view of Intel Pentium N3700

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium N3700

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 32.5W 6.7x lower typical power consumption
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 9.64 $/year 6.7x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 35.04 $/year 6.7x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Xeon 5113  vs Pentium N3700 

clock speed

Xeon 5113
1.6 GHz
Pentium N3700
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Xeon 5113
1.6 GHz
Pentium N3700
2.4 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Xeon 5113
1.6 GHz
Pentium N3700
1.6 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon 5113  vs
Pentium N3700 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 40W 6W
Annual home energy cost 9.64 $/year 1.45 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 35.04 $/year 5.26 $/year
Typical power consumption 32.5W 4.88W

details

Xeon 5113  vs
Pentium N3700 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 4 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz 2.4 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 400 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon 5113
Report a correction
Intel Pentium N3700
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus