Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon 5063

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 5063

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.53 GHz vs 2.69 GHz Around 70% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz vs 2.68 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron G1610

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1610

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 44.69W vs 77.19W More than 40% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 40% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Xeon 5063  vs Celeron G1610 

clock speed

Xeon 5063
3.2 GHz
Celeron G1610
2.6 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Xeon 5063
4.53 GHz
Celeron G1610
2.69 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Xeon 5063
3.2 GHz
Celeron G1610
2.68 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon 5063  vs
Celeron G1610 
Clock speed 3.2 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 55W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 13.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 48.18 $/year
Typical power consumption 77.19W 44.69W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Xeon 5063  vs
Celeron G1610 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 4 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 12 26

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.53 GHz 2.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz 2.68 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.53 GHz 2.69 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,050 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No Yes
Intel Xeon 5063
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G1610
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus