0 Comments
| Intel Xeon 5063 vs AMD Athlon II X2 220 |
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Xeon 5063
- 3.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon 5063
![]() | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | ![]() | Higher clock speed 3.2 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
VS
Released May, 2010
AMD Athlon II X2 220
- 2.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon II X2 220
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W |
![]() | Higher Maximum operating temperature 74 °C | ![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.53 GHz | vs | 3.83 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 77.19W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 74 °C | vs | 67 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.88 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Features Key features of the Xeon 5063 vs Athlon II X2 220
clock speed
Xeon 5063
3.2 GHz
Athlon II X2 220
2.8 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon 5063
4 MB
Athlon II X2 220
1 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Xeon 5063
4.53 GHz
Athlon II X2 220
3.83 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Xeon 5063
3.2 GHz
Athlon II X2 220
3.88 GHz
TDP
Xeon 5063
95W
Athlon II X2 220
65W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon 5063 | vs | Athlon II X2 220 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
AM3 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
details | Xeon 5063 | vs | Athlon II X2 220 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 1.07 - 1.35V | 0.9 - 1.4V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 67°C | Unknown - 74°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.53 GHz | 3.83 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 3.88 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.53 GHz | 3.83 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon 5063 ![]() | AMD Athlon II X2 220 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
220 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
220 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$216 | ||
220 vs E5430 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
220 vs 250 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
220 vs E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
220 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | ||
220 vs 3570K | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||