Intel Xeon 5020 vs Core i3 3217U |
First seen on January, 2013
Intel Xeon 5020
- 2.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon 5020
 | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | | Higher clock speed 2.5 GHz |
| | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core | | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
VS
Released June, 2012
Intel Core i3 3217U
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i3 3217U
| | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Much lower typical power consumption 13.81W |
| | Much lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year | | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 8x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 13.81W | vs | 77.19W | 5.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | 5.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 14.89 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | 5.6x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Xeon 5020 vs Core i3 3217U
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon 5020 | vs | Core i3 3217U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 771 | |||
| BGA 1023 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Xeon 5020 | vs | Core i3 3217U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.5 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 17W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 14.89 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 13.81W | |
 Intel Xeon 5020  Report a correction |  Intel Core i3 3217U Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| Intel Celeron N2830 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| AMD E1 6010 vs Intel Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 1007U vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $80 | $225 | |
| Intel Core i3 3110M vs 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| AMD E 450 vs Intel Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| AMD E2 6110 vs Intel Core i3 3217U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
