Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD FX 6300

AMD FX 6300

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon 3085

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 3085

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 77.19W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 6300

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 6300

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 6 MB vs 4 MB 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Much better performance per watt 9.84 pt/W vs 1.53 pt/W Around 6.5x better performance per watt
More cores 6 vs 2 Three times as many cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.75 GHz vs 3.12 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better PassMark score 6,444 vs 1,801 More than 3.5x better PassMark score
More threads 6 vs 2 Three times as many threads
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,446 vs 1,118 Around 30% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.82 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 3085 vs FX 6300

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon 3085
1,801
FX 6300
6,444

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon 3085
1,118
FX 6300
1,446

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon 3085  vs
FX 6300 
Clock speed 3 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Hexa core
Socket type
LGA 775
AM3+

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Clock speed 1,333 MHz 2,600 MHz

details

Xeon 3085  vs
FX 6300 
Threads 2 6
L2 cache 4 MB 6 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.12 GHz 4.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz 4.82 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.12 GHz 4.75 GHz

power consumption

TDP 65W 95W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 1.53 pt/W 9.84 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 77.19W
Intel Xeon 3085
Report a correction
AMD FX 6300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus