Intel Xeon 3075 vs Pentium G3220 |
First seen on January, 2013
Intel Xeon 3075
- 2.67 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon 3075
 | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
| | Supports trusted computing Yes | | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz |
VS
Released September, 2013
Intel Pentium G3220
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Pentium G3220
| | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Higher clock speed 3 GHz |
| | Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,745 | | Lower typical power consumption 43.88W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Pentium G3220CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 8x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | vs | 3.05 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.67 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,745 | vs | 1,062 | Around 65% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 43.88W | vs | 52.81W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Better PassMark score | 3,155 | vs | 1,840 | More than 70% better PassMark score | |||
| Better performance per watt | 2.75 pt/W | vs | 1.49 pt/W | Around 85% better performance per watt | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.67 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 3075 vs Pentium G3220
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon 3075 | vs | Pentium G3220 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.67 GHz | 3 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Xeon 3075 | vs | Pentium G3220 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.43 GHz | 3.05 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.67 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,769.9 | 3,009.1 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | 3.05 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 54W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 13.01 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 47.3 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.49 pt/W | 2.75 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 43.88W | |
 Intel Xeon 3075  Report a correction |  Intel Pentium G3220 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $70 | |
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs Pentium G3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $98 | $70 | |
| Intel Core i3 4130 vs Pentium G3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $135 | $70 | |
| Intel Core i3 2120 vs Pentium G3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $150 | $70 | |
| Intel Core i3 2100 vs Pentium G3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $45 | $70 | |
| AMD A4 7300 vs Intel Pentium G3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $205 | $70 | |
| Intel Core i5 2400 vs Pentium G3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $70 | |
| Intel Core i5 4690 vs Pentium G3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $275 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i3 5005U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9420 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS | |
| $50 | $125 | |
| AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
