0 Comments
| Intel Xeon 3075 vs Pentium G3220 |
First seen on January, 2013
Intel Xeon 3075
- 2.67 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon 3075
![]() | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz |
VS
Released September, 2013
Intel Pentium G3220
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Pentium G3220
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Higher clock speed 3 GHz |
![]() | Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,745 | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 43.88W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Intel Pentium G3220CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 8x more l2 cache per core | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | vs | 3.05 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.67 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,745 | vs | 1,062 | Around 65% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 43.88W | vs | 52.81W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
Better PassMark score | 3,155 | vs | 1,840 | More than 70% better PassMark score | |||
Better performance per watt | 2.75 pt/W | vs | 1.49 pt/W | Around 85% better performance per watt | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.67 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 3075 vs Pentium G3220
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon 3075
1,840
Pentium G3220
3,155
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon 3075
1,062
Pentium G3220
1,745
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon 3075 | vs | Pentium G3220 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.67 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Xeon 3075 | vs | Pentium G3220 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.43 GHz | 3.05 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.67 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,769.9 | 3,009.1 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | 3.05 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 54W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 13.01 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 47.3 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.49 pt/W | 2.75 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 43.88W |
Intel Xeon 3075 ![]() | Intel Pentium G3220 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $70 | |
Intel Core i3 4130 vs Pentium G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $70 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Pentium G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$47 | $70 | |
Intel Celeron G1840 vs Pentium G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$76 | $70 | |
Intel Pentium G2030 vs G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | $70 | |
Intel Core i3 2100 vs Pentium G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$145 | $70 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$135 | $70 | |
Intel Core i3 2120 vs Pentium G3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||