Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i5 2500K

Intel Core i5 2500K

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon 3075

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 3075

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 112.55W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 41.29 $/year 2.6x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 110.03 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 2500K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2500K

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 2.67 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,863 vs 1,062 More than 75% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.98 GHz vs 3.43 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better performance per watt 6.79 pt/W vs 1.49 pt/W More than 4.5x better performance per watt
Significantly better PassMark score 6,383 vs 1,840 Around 3.5x better PassMark score
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.88 GHz vs 2.67 GHz Around 85% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 3075 vs Core i5 2500K

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon 3075
1,840

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon 3075
1,062

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon 3075  vs
Core i5 2500K 
Clock speed 2.67 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 775
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Xeon 3075  vs
Core i5 2500K 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 4 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.43 GHz 4.98 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.67 GHz 4.88 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,769.9 5,433.6
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz 4.98 GHz

power consumption

TDP 65W 95W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 41.29 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 110.03 $/year
Performance per watt 1.49 pt/W 6.79 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 112.55W
Intel Xeon 3075
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 2500K
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus