Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i5 2400

Intel Core i5 2400

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon 3070

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 3070

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 93.6W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 27.75 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 100.92 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.79 GHz vs 3.54 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Front view of Intel Core i5 2400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2400

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 3.1 GHz vs 2.66 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Much better performance per watt 8.14 pt/W vs 1.7 pt/W More than 4.8x better performance per watt
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,742 vs 1,024 More than 70% better PassMark (Single core) score
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Better PassMark score 5,901 vs 1,776 More than 3.2x better PassMark score
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Higher Maximum operating temperature 72.6 °C vs 60.1 °C More than 20% higher Maximum operating temperature
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.51 GHz vs 2.67 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 3070 vs Core i5 2400

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 3070
2,576
Core i5 2400
8,298

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 3070
1,414
Core i5 2400
2,638

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 3070
111,100 MB/s
Core i5 2400
2,260,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon 3070
1,776
Core i5 2400
5,901

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon 3070
1,024
Core i5 2400
1,742

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon 3070  vs
Core i5 2400 
Clock speed 2.66 GHz 3.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 775
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 95W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 27.75 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 100.92 $/year
Performance per watt 1.7 pt/W 8.14 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 93.6W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Xeon 3070  vs
Core i5 2400 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 4 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 10 31
Operating temperature Unknown - 60.1°C Unknown - 72.6°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.79 GHz 3.54 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.67 GHz 3.51 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.79 GHz 3.54 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 2000
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 850 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,100 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Xeon 3070
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 2400
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus