CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3065 vs 3570K among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i5 3570K 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3570K  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i5 3570K

Intel Core i5 3570K

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon 3065

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 3065

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 107.5W 2x lower typical power consumption
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 38.81 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 106 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Higher Maximum operating temperature 72 °C vs 67.4 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of Intel Core i5 3570K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3570K

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.33 GHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 2,012 vs 864 More than 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better PassMark score 7,152 vs 1,504 More than 4.8x better PassMark score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.59 GHz vs 3.17 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better performance per watt 4.69 pt/W vs 0.97 pt/W More than 4.8x better performance per watt
Newer Apr, 2012 vs Oct, 2007 Release date over 4 years later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.71 GHz vs 2.33 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 3065 vs Core i5 3570K

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 3065
2,222
Core i5 3570K
10,311

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 3065
1,239

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 3065
99.1 MB/s
Core i5 3570K
2,650,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon 3065
1,504

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon 3065  vs
Core i5 3570K 
Clock speed 2.33 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 775
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 77W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 38.81 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 106 $/year
Performance per watt 0.97 pt/W 4.69 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 107.5W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Xeon 3065  vs
Core i5 3570K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 4 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Transistor count 291,000,000 1,400,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 7 34
Operating temperature Unknown - 72°C Unknown - 67.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.17 GHz 4.59 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.33 GHz 4.71 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,646.4 5,406.6
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.17 GHz 4.59 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Latest DirectX N/A 10.x
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz
3DMark06 N/A 5,339.9
Intel Xeon 3065
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3570K
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus