CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3065 vs 3220 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i3 3220 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3220  based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Intel Core i3 3220

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon 3065

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 3065

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.5 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Higher Maximum operating temperature 72 °C vs 65.3 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 2.33 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 5,399 vs 2,222 Around 2.5x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,764 vs 864 More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Oct, 2007 Release date over 4 years later
Lower typical power consumption 44.69W vs 52.81W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 2.69 pt/W vs 0.97 pt/W More than 2.8x better performance per watt
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz vs 3.17 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz vs 2.33 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 15% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 3065 vs Core i3 3220

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 3065
2,222
Core i3 3220
5,399

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 3065
1,239
Core i3 3220
2,501

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 3065
99.1 MB/s
Core i3 3220
173,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon 3065
1,504
Core i3 3220
4,229

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon 3065  vs
Core i3 3220 
Clock speed 2.33 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 55W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 13.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 48.18 $/year
Performance per watt 0.97 pt/W 2.69 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 44.69W

details

Xeon 3065  vs
Core i3 3220 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 4 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 7 33
Operating temperature Unknown - 72°C Unknown - 65.3°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.17 GHz 3.43 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.33 GHz 3.46 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,646.4 3,775.1
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.17 GHz 3.43 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 2500
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,050 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon 3065
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus