0 Comments
| Intel Xeon 3060 vs AMD Opteron 8216 |
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Xeon 3060
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon 3060
![]() | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
![]() | Newer manufacturing process 65 nm | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.46 GHz |
VS
Released August, 2006
AMD Opteron 8216
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 8216
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 2 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.46 GHz | vs | 2.88 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 77.19W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration |
Features Key features of the Xeon 3060 vs Opteron 8216
clock speed
Xeon 3060
2.4 GHz
Opteron 8216
2.4 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon 3060
4 MB
Opteron 8216
2 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Xeon 3060
3.46 GHz
Opteron 8216
2.88 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Xeon 3060
2.4 GHz
Opteron 8216
2.4 GHz
TDP
Xeon 3060
65W
Opteron 8216
95W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon 3060 | vs | Opteron 8216 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
F | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 77.19W |
details | Xeon 3060 | vs | Opteron 8216 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 90 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 8 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 12 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.5V | 1.3 - UnknownV | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 60.1°C | 0 - 55°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.46 GHz | 2.88 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.46 GHz | 2.88 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon 3060 ![]() | AMD Opteron 8216 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||