CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3050 vs J1900 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron J1900 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron J1900  based on its performance, power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Intel Celeron J1900

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon 3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 3050

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 91,600 MB/s vs 56,900 MB/s More than 60% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.39 GHz vs 2.42 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.55 GHz vs 2.42 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 52.81W 6.5x lower typical power consumption
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly better performance per watt 4.27 pt/W vs 1.38 pt/W More than 3x better performance per watt
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 6.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 6.5x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 3050 vs Celeron J1900

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 3050
2,109

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 3050
91,600 MB/s
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon 3050
1,311

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon 3050  vs
Celeron J1900 
Clock speed 2.13 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 854 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No

details

Xeon 3050  vs
Celeron J1900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.39 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.55 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.39 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption

TDP 65W 10W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 1.38 pt/W 4.27 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon 3050
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus