Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Quark X1020D

Reasons to consider the
Intel Quark X1020D

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 1.79W vs 159.66W 89.3x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 0.53 $/year vs 56.1 $/year 105.9x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 1.93 $/year vs 159.62 $/year 82.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C vs 61 °C Around 15% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Mar, 2014 vs Oct, 2012 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 0.4 GHz 10x higher clock speed
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Instruction set extensions ABM, AES, AMD-V, AMD64, AVX, AVX 1.1, BMI1, CLMUL, CVT16, F16C, FMA3, FMA4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, Supplemental SSE3, TBM, XOP vs None Supports instruction-set-extensions
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
More cores 8 vs 1 7 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 1 7 more threads

Features Key features of the Quark X1020D  vs FX 8350 

clock speed

Quark X1020D
0.4 GHz
FX 8350
4 GHz

TDP

FX 8350
125W

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Quark X1020D  vs
FX 8350 
Clock speed 0.4 GHz 4 GHz
Cores Single core Octa core
Socket type
BGA 393
AM3+
Is unlocked No Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-800
Channels Single Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 6,400 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s

details

Quark X1020D  vs
FX 8350 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 8
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature 0 - 70°C Unknown - 61°C

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

power consumption

TDP 2.2W 125W
Annual home energy cost 0.53 $/year 56.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 1.93 $/year 159.62 $/year
Typical power consumption 1.79W 159.66W
Intel Quark X1020D
Report a correction
AMD FX 8350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus