Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Quark X1010D

Reasons to consider the
Intel Quark X1010D

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 1.79W vs 73.94W 41.4x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 0.53 $/year vs 21.92 $/year 41.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 1.93 $/year vs 79.72 $/year 41.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C vs 64 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of Intel Core i7 6700K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 6700K

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 0.4 GHz 10x higher clock speed
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Instruction set extensions AES, AVX, AVX 2.0, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, Supplemental SSE3 vs None Supports instruction-set-extensions
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
More threads 8 vs 1 7 more threads
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Mar, 2014 Release date over 1 years later

Features Key features of the Quark X1010D  vs Core i7 6700K 

clock speed

Quark X1010D
0.4 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Quark X1010D  vs
Core i7 6700K 
Clock speed 0.4 GHz 4 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core
Is unlocked No Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-800
Channels Single Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 6,400 MB/s 25,600 MB/s

details

Quark X1010D  vs
Core i7 6700K 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 8
Manufacture process 32 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature 0 - 70°C Unknown - 64°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 530
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz

power consumption

TDP 2.2W 91W
Annual home energy cost 0.53 $/year 21.92 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 1.93 $/year 79.72 $/year
Typical power consumption 1.79W 73.94W
Intel Quark X1010D
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 6700K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus