0 Comments
| Intel Pentium U5400 vs Core2 Duo T5250 |
Released May, 2010
Intel Pentium U5400
- 1.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium U5400
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Duo T5250 vs the Pentium U5400. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium U5400 vs Core2 Duo T5250
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium U5400
1,079
Core2 Duo T5250
1,458
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium U5400
678
Core2 Duo T5250
812
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium U5400
46.8 MB/s
Core2 Duo T5250
63,700 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium U5400
1,232
Core2 Duo T5250
1,339
GeekBench
Pentium U5400
1,737
Core2 Duo T5250
2,369
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium U5400
838
Core2 Duo T5250
828
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium U5400
481
Core2 Duo T5250
519
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium U5400 | vs | Core2 Duo T5250 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
BGA 1288 | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 18W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.34 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.88 pt/W | 1.72 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 14.63W | 28.44W |
details | Pentium U5400 | vs | Core2 Duo T5250 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 382,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 9 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.78 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.2 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.2 GHz | 1.78 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 166 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 500 MHz | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Pentium U5400 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo T5250 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||