0 Comments
| Intel Pentium T4400 vs Core2 Duo T7500 |
VS
Released July, 2006
Intel Core2 Duo T7500
- 2.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo T7500
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Pentium T4400 vs the Core2 Duo T7500. | |||||||
| |||||||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines |
---|
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T4400 vs Core2 Duo T7500
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4400
2,075
Core2 Duo T7500
1,995
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4400
1,150
Core2 Duo T7500
1,183
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4400
92,800 MB/s
Core2 Duo T7500
89,900 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4400
1,955
Core2 Duo T7500
1,917
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4400
2,147
Core2 Duo T7500
1,969
GeekBench
Pentium T4400
3,387
Core2 Duo T7500
3,729
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium T4400
1,282
Core2 Duo T7500
7,135
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium T4400
846
Core2 Duo T7500
1,851
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium T4400 | vs | Core2 Duo T7500 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
478 | |||
P | |||
479 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.56 pt/W | 4.11 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W |
details | Pentium T4400 | vs | Core2 Duo T7500 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 11 | 11 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.51 GHz | 2.97 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.51 GHz | 2.97 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Intel Pentium T4400 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo T7500 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $125 | |
T4400 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | ||
T4400 vs T9500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $316 | |
T4400 vs T9600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | $197 | |
T7500 vs T8100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | $236 | |
T7500 vs T8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | $309 | |
T7500 vs T9300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | ||
T7500 vs T9500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||