CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T4400 vs 3220 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores
Pentium T4400
5.1
Core i3 3220
5.5
Core2 Duo E8400
5.2
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance
Pentium T4400
7.3
Core i3 3220
8.7
Core2 Duo E8400
7.9
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Pentium T4400
n.d.
Core i3 3220
n.d.
Core2 Duo E8400
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Pentium T4400
0.0
Core i3 3220
4.6
Core2 Duo E8400
0.0
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Pentium T4400
5.2
Core i3 3220
5.3
Core2 Duo E8400
5.1
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?
Pentium T4400
n.d.
Core i3 3220
10.0
Core2 Duo E8400
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more
8.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets
Pentium T4400
5.0
Core i3 3220
8.3
Core2 Duo E8400
5.1

Winner
Intel Core i3 3220 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3220  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium T4400

Front view of Intel Pentium T4400
Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Intel Core i3 3220

CPUBoss Winner
Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium T4400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium T4400

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,897 vs 47.7 More than 39.8x better 3DMark06 CPU score
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 44.69W More than 35% lower typical power consumption
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 13.25 $/year More than 35% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 48.18 $/year More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 5,351 vs 1,955 Around 2.8x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 5,399 vs 2,075 More than 2.5x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,764 vs 846 More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better performance per dollar 1.18 pt/$ vs 0.67 pt/$ More than 75% better performance per dollar
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz vs 2.51 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Oct, 2009 Release date over 2 years later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T4400 vs Core i3 3220

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium T4400
2,075
Core i3 3220
5,399

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium T4400
1,150
Core i3 3220
2,501

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium T4400
92,800 MB/s
Core i3 3220
173,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium T4400
1,955
Core i3 3220
5,351

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium T4400
2,147
Core i3 3220
5,707

GeekBench

Pentium T4400
3,387
Core i3 3220
8,919

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Pentium T4400
1,282
Core i3 3220
4,229

PassMark (Single Core)

Pentium T4400
846
Core i3 3220
1,764

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Pentium T4400  vs
Core i3 3220 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
478
P
LGA 1155

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 35W 55W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 13.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 48.18 $/year
Performance per watt 2.56 pt/W 2.69 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 44.69W

details

 Pentium T4400  vs
Core i3 3220 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 11 33

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.51 GHz 3.43 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz 3.46 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.51 GHz 3.43 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 2500
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,050 MHz

bus
Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Pentium T4400
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss