0 Comments
| Intel Pentium T4400 vs Celeron 900 |
Released October, 2009
Intel Pentium T4400
- 2.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium T4400
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 900 vs the Pentium T4400. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T4400 vs Celeron 900
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4400
2,075
Celeron 900
1,094
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4400
1,150
Celeron 900
1,102
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4400
92,800 MB/s
Celeron 900
88,700 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4400
1,955
Celeron 900
1,046
GeekBench
Pentium T4400
3,387
Celeron 900
1,767
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Pentium T4400
1,897
Celeron 900
1,000
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium T4400
1,282
Celeron 900
678
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium T4400
846
Celeron 900
782
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium T4400 | vs | Celeron 900 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
478 | |||
P | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.56 pt/W | 2.16 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W |
details | Pentium T4400 | vs | Celeron 900 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.51 GHz | 3.11 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.51 GHz | 3.11 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Intel Pentium T4400 ![]() | Intel Celeron 900 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $134 | |
3220 vs T4400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$316 | $134 | |
T9600 vs T4400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | ||
T5800 vs T4400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | ||
T6600 vs T4400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | ||
T6400 vs T4400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | ||
T9900 vs T4400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $70 | |
3120M vs 900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||