CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T4400 vs 900

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium T4400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium T4400

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much better performance per dollar 6.47 pt/$ vs 2.19 pt/$ Around 3x better performance per dollar
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,897 vs 1,000 Around 90% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 1,969 vs 1,049 Around 90% better geekbench (32-bit) score
Slightly better PassMark score 1,303 vs 696 More than 85% better PassMark score
Marginally newer Oct, 2009 vs Jan, 2009 Release date 9 months later
Front view of Intel Celeron 900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 900

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.71 GHz vs 2.37 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T4400 vs Celeron 900

GeekBench (32-bit)

GeekBench

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium T4400  vs
Celeron 900 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
478
P
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has vitualization support No No
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

gpu

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz

details

Pentium T4400  vs
Celeron 900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nms 45 nms
Transistor count 410,000,000 410,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.37 GHz 2.71 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.37 GHz 2.71 GHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 7.39 pt/W 4.38 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W
Intel Pentium T4400
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 900
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus