Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium T4300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium T4300

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.1 GHz vs 1.45 GHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Front view of AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Lower typical power consumption 20.31W vs 28.44W Around 30% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 30% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year vs 30.66 $/year Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Pentium T4300  vs Sempron Sempron™ 2650 

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium T4300  vs
Sempron Sempron™ 2650 
Clock speed 2.1 GHz 1.45 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
FMA4
Supplemental SSE3
AES

details

Pentium T4300  vs
Sempron Sempron™ 2650 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 28 nm

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ R3
Latest DirectX N/A 12.0
GPU clock speed N/A 400 MHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 25W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 21.9 $/year
Typical power consumption 28.44W 20.31W
Intel Pentium T4300
Report a correction
AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus