0 Comments
| Intel Pentium T4200 vs Core2 Duo T8300 |
VS
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo T8300
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo T8300
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Pentium T4200 vs the Core2 Duo T8300. | |||||||
| |||||||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines |
---|
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T4200 vs Core2 Duo T8300
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
1,895
Core2 Duo T8300
2,322
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
1,053
Core2 Duo T8300
1,315
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
84,600 MB/s
Core2 Duo T8300
98,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
1,796
Core2 Duo T8300
2,095
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
3,322
Core2 Duo T8300
2,408
GeekBench
Pentium T4200
3,322
Core2 Duo T8300
3,828
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium T4200
1,150
Core2 Duo T8300
1,480
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium T4200
1,152
Core2 Duo T8300
936
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium T4200 | vs | Core2 Duo T8300 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
478 | |||
479 | |||
P | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.58 pt/W | 2.58 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W |
details | Pentium T4200 | vs | Core2 Duo T8300 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 3 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 12 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.43 GHz | 2.53 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.43 GHz | 2.53 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Intel Pentium T4200 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo T8300 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$309 | $236 | |
T9300 vs T8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | $236 | |
T7500 vs T8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$309 | $236 | |
T7700 vs T8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | ||
T9500 vs T8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | ||
T7300 vs T8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$197 | $236 | |
T8100 vs T8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $2 | |
3220 vs T4200 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||