0 Comments
| Intel Pentium T4200 vs Core2 Duo T8100 |
VS
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo T8100
- 2.1 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo T8100
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Pentium T4200 vs the Core2 Duo T8100. | |||||||
| |||||||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines |
---|
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T4200 vs Core2 Duo T8100
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
1,895
Core2 Duo T8100
2,042
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
1,053
Core2 Duo T8100
1,164
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
84,600 MB/s
Core2 Duo T8100
85,900 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
1,796
Core2 Duo T8100
1,925
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
3,322
Core2 Duo T8100
1,997
GeekBench
Pentium T4200
3,322
Core2 Duo T8100
2,994
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium T4200
1,150
Core2 Duo T8100
1,291
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium T4200
1,152
Core2 Duo T8100
828
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium T4200 | vs | Core2 Duo T8100 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
478 | |||
479 | |||
P | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.58 pt/W | 2.49 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W |
details | Pentium T4200 | vs | Core2 Duo T8100 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 3 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 10 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.43 GHz | 2.47 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.43 GHz | 2.47 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Intel Pentium T4200 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo T8100 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | $197 | |
Intel Core2 Duo T7500 vs T8100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$197 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo T9500 vs T8100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$309 | $197 | |
Intel Core2 Duo T9300 vs T8100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$197 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo T7300 vs T8100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$211 | $197 | |
Intel Core2 Duo P8600 vs T8100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $2 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Pentium T4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$253 | $2 | |
Intel Core2 Duo P8800 vs Pentium T4200 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||