0 Comments
| Intel Pentium T4200 vs Core2 Duo T5800 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Pentium T4200 vs the Core2 Duo T5800. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Duo T5800 vs the Pentium T4200. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T4200 vs Core2 Duo T5800
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
1,895
Core2 Duo T5800
1,869
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
1,053
Core2 Duo T5800
1,037
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
84,600 MB/s
Core2 Duo T5800
84,400 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
1,796
Core2 Duo T5800
1,685
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
3,322
Core2 Duo T5800
3,038
GeekBench
Pentium T4200
3,322
Core2 Duo T5800
3,038
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium T4200
1,150
Core2 Duo T5800
1,112
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium T4200
1,152
Core2 Duo T5800
677
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium T4200 | vs | Core2 Duo T5800 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.58 pt/W | 2.25 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
details | Pentium T4200 | vs | Core2 Duo T5800 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 10 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.43 GHz | 2.16 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 2 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 457.7 | 711.5 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.43 GHz | 2.16 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium T4200 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo T5800 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $2 | |
3220 vs T4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | $2 | |
T8300 vs T4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$197 | $2 | |
T7250 vs T4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$316 | $2 | |
T9600 vs T4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$309 | $2 | |
T9300 vs T4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $2 | |
4200U vs T4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
3217U vs T5800 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||