0 Comments
| Intel Pentium T4200 vs Celeron 900 |
Released January, 2009
Intel Pentium T4200
- 2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium T4200
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 900 vs the Pentium T4200. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T4200 vs Celeron 900
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
1,895
Celeron 900
1,094
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
1,053
Celeron 900
1,102
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
84,600 MB/s
Celeron 900
88,700 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T4200
1,796
Celeron 900
1,046
GeekBench
Pentium T4200
3,322
Celeron 900
1,767
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Pentium T4200
1,636
Celeron 900
1,000
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium T4200
1,150
Celeron 900
678
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium T4200
1,152
Celeron 900
782
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium T4200 | vs | Celeron 900 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.58 pt/W | 2.16 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W |
details | Pentium T4200 | vs | Celeron 900 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.43 GHz | 3.11 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.43 GHz | 3.11 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Intel Pentium T4200 ![]() | Intel Celeron 900 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $2 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Pentium T4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo T7300 vs Pentium T4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2 | ||
Intel Pentium T3400 vs T4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$316 | $2 | |
Intel Core2 Duo T9600 vs Pentium T4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$197 | $70 | |
Intel Core2 Duo T7250 vs Celeron 900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $70 | |
Intel Core i3 3120M vs Celeron 900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | ||
Intel Pentium T4500 vs Celeron 900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||