CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T4200 vs 3500+ among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Pentium T4200 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium T4200  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium T4200

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium T4200

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 1 MB l2 cache is just OK
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 0.5 MB/core l2 cache per core is just OK
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better performance per watt 2.58 pt/W vs 1.35 pt/W More than 90% better performance per watt
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,895 vs 1,388 More than 35% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Front view of AMD Sempron 3500+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3500+

Report a correction
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,385 vs 1,053 More than 30% better geekbench 3 single core score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.66 GHz vs 2.43 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.93 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T4200 vs Sempron 3500+

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium T4200
84,600 MB/s
Sempron 3500+
181.4 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium T4200  vs
Sempron 3500+ 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
478
AM2

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 2.58 pt/W 1.35 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W

details

Pentium T4200  vs
Sempron 3500+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.43 GHz 2.66 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 2.93 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.43 GHz 2.66 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 333 MHz
Intel Pentium T4200
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 3500+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus