Intel Pentium T3400 vs T3200 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T3400 vs the T3200. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the T3200 vs the T3400. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T3400 vs T3200
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium T3400 | vs | T3200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 478 | |||
| P | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.4 pt/W | 2.22 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 667 MHz | 667 MHz | |
details | Pentium T3400 | vs | T3200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
| Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 13 | 12 | |
| Voltage range | 1.07 - 1.18V | 1.07 - 1.18V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.73 GHz | 2.29 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.17 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.73 GHz | 2.29 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Pentium T3400  Report a correction |  Intel Pentium T3200 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| T3400 vs 3217U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $21 | ||
| T3400 vs 370M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $236 | ||
| T3400 vs T7500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| T3400 vs T2050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $211 | ||
| T3400 vs P8600 | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| T3200 vs 3217U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $2 | ||
| T3200 vs T4200 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS | |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
