0 Comments
| Intel Pentium T3400 vs Core2 Duo T7300 |
VS
Released April, 2007
Intel Core2 Duo T7300
- 2 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo T7300
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Pentium T3400 vs the Core2 Duo T7300. | |||||||
| |||||||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines |
---|
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T3400 vs Core2 Duo T7300
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T3400
1,986
Core2 Duo T7300
1,956
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T3400
1,092
Core2 Duo T7300
1,108
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T3400
91,100 MB/s
Core2 Duo T7300
81,900 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T3400
1,766
Core2 Duo T7300
1,803
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T3400
3,485
Core2 Duo T7300
2,037
GeekBench
Pentium T3400
3,485
Core2 Duo T7300
3,340
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium T3400
1,115
Core2 Duo T7300
5,169
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium T3400
740
Core2 Duo T7300
1,867
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium T3400 | vs | Core2 Duo T7300 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
478 | |||
P | |||
479 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.4 pt/W | 3.61 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W |
details | Pentium T3400 | vs | Core2 Duo T7300 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 13 | 10 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.73 GHz | 2.33 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.17 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.73 GHz | 2.33 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 667 MHz | 800 MHz |
Intel Pentium T3400 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo T7300 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$197 | ||
T8100 vs T7300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | ||
T7500 vs T7300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
T5870 vs T7300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
T4300 vs T7300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
3217U vs T7300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$309 | ||
T9300 vs T7300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | ||
T7500 vs T3400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||