CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T3400 vs 880

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Value

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Value

Winner
Intel Core i7 880 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 880  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i7 880

Intel Core i7 880

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium T3400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium T3400

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 123.55W 4.3x lower typical power consumption
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 41.57 $/year 4.9x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 126.14 $/year 4.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i7 880

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 880

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 45 nms vs 65 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Higher clock speed 3.06 GHz vs 2.16 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Has vitualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly better geekbench (32-bit) score 8,345 vs 1,766 Around 4.8x better geekbench (32-bit) score
Significantly better PassMark score 5,708 vs 1,143 Around 5x better PassMark score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.3 GHz vs 2.31 GHz More than 85% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,331 vs 739 More than 80% better PassMark (Single core) score
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Marginally newer May, 2010 vs Oct, 2008 Release date over 1 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.06 GHz vs 2.17 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T3400 vs Core i7 880

GeekBench (32-bit)

GeekBench

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium T3400  vs
Core i7 880 
Clock speed 2.16 GHz 3.06 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
478
LGA 1156
Is hyperthreaded No Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has vitualization support No Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Pentium T3400  vs
Core i7 880 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 8
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nms 45 nms
Transistor count 291,000,000 774,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 13 23
Voltage range 1.08 - 1.18V 0.65 - 1.4V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.31 GHz 4.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.17 GHz 3.06 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.31 GHz 4.3 GHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 95W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 41.57 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 126.14 $/year
Performance per watt 7.09 pt/W 5.16 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 123.55W
Intel Pentium T3400
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 880
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus