Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium T3400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium T3400

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Front view of Intel Celeron M 550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 550

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 550 vs the Pentium T3400.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T3400 vs Celeron M 550

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium T3400  vs
Celeron M 550 
Clock speed 2.16 GHz 0.55 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
478
479
495

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 35W 4W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 0.96 $/year
Typical power consumption 28.44W 3.25W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 667 MHz 100 MHz

details

Pentium T3400  vs
Celeron M 550 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.13 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.13 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 180 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.73 GHz 2.27 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.17 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.73 GHz 2.27 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Pentium T3400
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 550
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus