CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T3400 vs 575 among laptop CPUs (over 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium T3400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium T3400

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Front view of Intel Celeron 575

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 575

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 575 vs the Pentium T3400.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T3400 vs Celeron 575

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium T3400
91,100 MB/s
Celeron 575
82,400 MB/s

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium T3400  vs
Celeron 575 
Clock speed 2.16 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
478

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 35W 31W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 7.47 $/year
Performance per watt 2.4 pt/W 2.59 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 25.19W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 667 MHz 667 MHz

details

Pentium T3400  vs
Celeron 575 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 291,000,000 291,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 13 12
Voltage range 1.07 - 1.18V 0.95 - 1.3V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.73 GHz 2.38 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.17 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.73 GHz 2.38 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Pentium T3400
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 575
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus