CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of T3400 vs 2350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

4.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Pentium T3400 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium T3400  based on its single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium T3400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium T3400

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 36.56W More than 20% lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 2.4 pt/W vs 1.3 pt/W More than 85% better performance per watt
Newer Oct, 2008 vs Jun, 2007 Release date over 1 years later
Lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 10.84 $/year More than 20% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 39.42 $/year More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon X2 2350

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X2 2350

Report a correction
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.03 GHz vs 2.73 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T3400 vs Athlon X2 2350

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium T3400  vs
Athlon X2 2350 
Clock speed 2.16 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
478
AM2

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 45W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 2.4 pt/W 1.3 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 36.56W

details

Pentium T3400  vs
Athlon X2 2350 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.73 GHz 3.03 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.17 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.73 GHz 3.03 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Pentium T3400
Report a correction
AMD Athlon X2 2350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus