0 Comments
| Intel Pentium T2370 vs Core i3 2365M |
VS
Released July, 2012
Intel Core i3 2365M
- 1.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i3 2365M
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Pentium T2370 vs the Core i3 2365M. | |||||||
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T2370 vs Core i3 2365M
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T2370
1,568
Core i3 2365M
2,255
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T2370
874
Core i3 2365M
1,092
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T2370
73,400 MB/s
Core i3 2365M
68,800 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T2370
1,461
Core i3 2365M
2,128
GeekBench
Pentium T2370
2,452
Core i3 2365M
2,584
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium T2370
843
Core i3 2365M
1,669
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium T2370
575
Core i3 2365M
677
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium T2370 | vs | Core i3 2365M |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
478 | |||
P | |||
BGA 1023 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 17W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.9 pt/W | 4.78 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 13.81W |
details | Pentium T2370 | vs | Core i3 2365M |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 13 | 14 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.25 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.73 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 125.5 | 888.8 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.25 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,000 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Pentium T2370 ![]() | Intel Core i3 2365M ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
E2-2000 vs 2365M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
987 vs 2365M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
997 vs 2365M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
MV-40 vs 2365M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
2127U vs 2365M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $225 | |
3217U vs 2365M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$86 | $225 | |
887 vs 2365M | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||