0 Comments
| Intel Pentium T2370 vs Celeron T1600 |
Released January, 2008
Intel Pentium T2370
- 1.73 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium T2370
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron T1600 vs the Pentium T2370. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T2370 vs Celeron T1600
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T2370
1,568
Celeron T1600
1,513
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T2370
874
Celeron T1600
863
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T2370
73,400 MB/s
Celeron T1600
70,550 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T2370
1,461
Celeron T1600
1,433
GeekBench
Pentium T2370
2,452
Celeron T1600
1,853
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium T2370
843
Celeron T1600
931
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium T2370
575
Celeron T1600
596
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium T2370 | vs | Celeron T1600 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 1.66 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
478 | |||
P | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.9 pt/W | 1.89 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 533 MHz | 667 MHz |
details | Pentium T2370 | vs | Celeron T1600 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 13 | 10 | |
Voltage range | 1.07 - 1.18V | 1.07 - 1.18V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.25 GHz | 2.27 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.73 GHz | 1.67 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.25 GHz | 2.27 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium T2370 ![]() | Intel Celeron T1600 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||