0 Comments
| Intel Pentium T2310 vs Celeron 560 |
Released October, 2007
Intel Pentium T2310
- 1.46 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium T2310
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 560 vs the Pentium T2310. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium T2310 vs Celeron 560
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T2310
1,342
Celeron 560
981
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T2310
762
Celeron 560
988
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T2310
61,800 MB/s
Celeron 560
85,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium T2310
1,286
Celeron 560
948
GeekBench
Pentium T2310
1,561
Celeron 560
1,545
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium T2310
723
Celeron 560
533
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium T2310
497
Celeron 560
666
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium T2310 | vs | Celeron 560 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.46 GHz | 2.13 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 31W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 7.47 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.63 pt/W | 2.2 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 25.19W |
details | Pentium T2310 | vs | Celeron 560 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 11 | 16 | |
Voltage range | 1.07 - 1.18V | 0.95 - 1.3V | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 533 MHz | 533 MHz |
Intel Pentium T2310 ![]() | Intel Celeron 560 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||