CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of SU4100 vs N2940 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Pentium SU4100 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium SU4100  based on its performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium SU4100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium SU4100

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,168.5 vs 23 More than 50.8x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 55,000 MB/s vs 52,800 MB/s Around 5% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Celeron N2940

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2940

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 1.83 GHz vs 1.3 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer Jul, 2014 vs Jul, 2009 Release date over 5 years later
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 2,768 vs 1,312 More than 2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.25 GHz vs 1.63 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per watt 7.82 pt/W vs 6.16 pt/W More than 25% better performance per watt
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.25 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium SU4100 vs Celeron N2940

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium SU4100
55,000 MB/s
Celeron N2940
52,800 MB/s

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium SU4100  vs
Celeron N2940 
Clock speed 1.3 GHz 1.83 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 7.5W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 1.81 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 6.57 $/year
Performance per watt 6.16 pt/W 7.82 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 6.09W

details

Pentium SU4100  vs
Celeron N2940 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.63 GHz 2.25 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.3 GHz 2.25 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.63 GHz 2.25 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 313 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 854 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Pentium SU4100
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N2940
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus