Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium SU2700

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium SU2700

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 584 vs 20.3 More than 28.8x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 53,650 MB/s vs 41,900 MB/s Around 30% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Better performance per watt 4.53 pt/W vs 2.34 pt/W Around 95% better performance per watt
Lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 14.63W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 4.34 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 15.77 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E 300

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 300

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Newer Aug, 2011 vs Jun, 2009 Release date over 2 years later
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium SU2700 vs E 300

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium SU2700
53,650 MB/s
E 300
41,900 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

E 300
1,233

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium SU2700  vs
E 300 
Clock speed 1.3 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Pentium SU2700  vs
E 300 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6310
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 488 MHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 18W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 4.53 pt/W 2.34 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 14.63W
Intel Pentium SU2700
Report a correction
AMD E 300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus