CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of SU2700 vs C-60 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Pentium SU2700 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium SU2700  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium SU2700

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Pentium SU2700

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium SU2700

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium SU2700

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 584 vs 19.5 Around 30x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 53,650 MB/s vs 38,550 MB/s Around 40% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Higher clock speed 1.3 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.3 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD C-60

Reasons to consider the
AMD C-60

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Newer Aug, 2011 vs Jun, 2009 Release date over 2 years later
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium SU2700 vs AMD C-60

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium SU2700
53,650 MB/s
AMD C-60
38,550 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

AMD C-60
1,133

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium SU2700  vs
AMD C-60 
Clock speed 1.3 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 9W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 2.17 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 7.88 $/year
Performance per watt 4.53 pt/W 3.96 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 7.31W

details

Pentium SU2700  vs
AMD C-60 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.3 GHz 1.34 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.3 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.3 GHz 1.34 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A AMD Radeon HD 6290
GPU clock speed N/A 276 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 400 MHz
Intel Pentium SU2700
Report a correction
AMD C-60
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus