0 Comments
| Intel Pentium P6200 vs Core2 Duo P7350 |
Released July, 2010
Intel Pentium P6200
- 2.13 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium P6200
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Duo P7350 vs the Pentium P6200. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium P6200 vs Core2 Duo P7350
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium P6200
2,288
Core2 Duo P7350
1,994
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium P6200
1,302
Core2 Duo P7350
1,137
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium P6200
89,700 MB/s
Core2 Duo P7350
81,600 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium P6200
2,199
Core2 Duo P7350
1,841
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium P6200
2,194
Core2 Duo P7350
2,055
GeekBench
Pentium P6200
2,836
Core2 Duo P7350
3,091
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium P6200
1,344
Core2 Duo P7350
1,301
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium P6200
810
Core2 Duo P7350
788
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium P6200 | vs | Core2 Duo P7350 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
rPGA 988A | |||
479 | |||
P | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 25W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.62 pt/W | 3.08 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 20.31W |
details | Pentium P6200 | vs | Core2 Duo P7350 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 3 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 382,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.15 GHz | 2.41 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.13 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.15 GHz | 2.41 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 500 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 667 MHz | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Pentium P6200 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo P7350 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$10 | $522 | |
Intel Core i3 330M vs Pentium P6200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $522 | |
Intel Core i3 380M vs Pentium P6200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$21 | $522 | |
Intel Core i3 370M vs Pentium P6200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $522 | |
Intel Core i3 350M vs Pentium P6200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $522 | |
Intel Core i5 3317U vs Pentium P6200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$60 | $522 | |
Intel Core i5 560M vs Pentium P6200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | $522 | |
Intel Core i5 520M vs Pentium P6200 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||