Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium P6100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium P6100

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 84.5W 3x lower typical power consumption
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Jul, 2010 vs Jul, 2006 Release date over 4 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 25.05 $/year 3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 91.1 $/year 3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Itanium 9030

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9030

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 4 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much more l3 cache per core 4 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core Around 2.8x more l3 cache per core
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 3 MB Around 2.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later

Features Key features of the Pentium P6100  vs Itanium 9030 

clock speed

Itanium 9030
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium P6100  vs
Itanium 9030 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 500 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 667 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No

details

Pentium P6100  vs
Itanium 9030 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 4 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 4 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 90 nm
Transistor count 382,000,000 1,720,000,000
Max CPUs 1 4
Clock multiplier 15 12

power consumption

TDP 35W 104W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 25.05 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 91.1 $/year
Typical power consumption 28.44W 84.5W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Pentium P6100
Report a correction
Intel Itanium 9030
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus