Winner
Intel Core i3 5010U
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 5010U based on its features.
See full details Intel Pentium N3700 vs Core i3 5010U |
Released January, 2015
Intel Pentium N3700
- 1.6 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
6.4 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium N3700
 | Is unlocked Yes |
VS
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3700 vs 5010U among laptop CPUs (up to 15W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 8.1 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core i3 5010U vs the Pentium N3700. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium N3700 vs Core i3 5010U
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium N3700 | vs | Core i3 5010U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
| Is unlocked | Yes | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 6W | 15W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 12.34 pt/W | 48.62 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI 2.0 | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Pentium N3700 | vs | Core i3 5010U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 5500 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | 300 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 16,384 MB | |
 Intel Pentium N3700  Report a correction |  Intel Core i3 5010U Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | $161 | |
| 5200U vs N3700 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | $161 | |
| N3050 vs N3700 | ||
 | VS | |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 5005U vs N3700 | ||
 | VS | |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3700 | ||
 | VS | |
| $161 | $161 | |
| N3540 vs N3700 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | $281 | |
| 4200U vs 5010U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 5010U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
| | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
| | VS | |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $50 | $125 | |
| 5300 vs 3220 | ||
