0 Comments
| Intel Pentium N3700 vs Core i3 5010U |
Released January, 2015
Intel Pentium N3700
- 1.6 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium N3700
![]() | Is unlocked Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core i3 5010U vs the Pentium N3700. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium N3700 vs Core i3 5010U
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
Pentium N3700
13.56 mHash/s
Core i3 5010U
26.47 mHash/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
Pentium N3700
4.52 mPixels/s
Core i3 5010U
16.23 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
Pentium N3700
0.53 fps
Core i3 5010U
1.19 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium N3700
2,570
Core i3 5010U
4,138
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium N3700
954
Core i3 5010U
1,995
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium N3700
382.3 MB/s
Core i3 5010U
2,730,000 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium N3700
1,863
Core i3 5010U
3,061
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium N3700
547
Core i3 5010U
1,171
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium N3700 | vs | Core i3 5010U |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
Is unlocked | Yes | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 6W | 15W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 12.34 pt/W | 48.62 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Pentium N3700 | vs | Core i3 5010U |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 5500 | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | 300 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 16,384 MB |
Intel Pentium N3700 ![]() | Intel Core i3 5010U ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $161 | |
5200U vs N3700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $161 | |
N3050 vs N3700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
5005U vs N3700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $161 | |
N3540 vs N3700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
4200U vs 5010U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 5010U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
5200U vs 5010U | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||