CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3700 vs N3050 among laptop CPUs (up to 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Pentium N3700 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium N3700  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium N3700

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium N3700

Report a correction
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much higher GPU clock speed 400 MHz vs 320 MHz 25% higher GPU clock speed
Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium N3700 vs Celeron N3050

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Pentium N3700
13.56 mHash/s
Celeron N3050
6.7 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Pentium N3700
4.99 mPixels/s
Celeron N3050
4.25 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Pentium N3700
97.94 fps
Celeron N3050
62.65 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Pentium N3700
0.53 fps
Celeron N3050
0.42 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench

Pentium N3700
4.89 fps
Celeron N3050
4.1 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium N3700
382.3 MB/s
Celeron N3050
341.5 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium N3700  vs
Celeron N3050 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.16 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 6W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 1.45 $/year
Performance per watt 16.84 pt/W 11.63 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 4.88W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Pentium N3700  vs
Celeron N3050 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.14 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 2.14 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 400 MHz 320 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB
Intel Pentium N3700
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus