Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium N3700

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium N3700

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 0.9 GHz Around 80% higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Front view of Intel Celeron M 333

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 333

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 333 vs the Pentium N3700.

Features Key features of the Pentium N3700  vs Celeron M 333 

clock speed

Pentium N3700
1.6 GHz
Celeron M 333
0.9 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium N3700  vs
Celeron M 333 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 0.9 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 6W 7W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 1.69 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 6.13 $/year
Typical power consumption 4.88W 5.69W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Pentium N3700  vs
Celeron M 333 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 400 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Pentium N3700
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 333
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus