Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Celeron 3765U

Intel Celeron 3765U

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium N3700

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium N3700

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better performance per watt 12.34 pt/W vs 6.87 pt/W Around 80% better performance per watt
Higher GPU clock speed 400 MHz vs 300 MHz Around 35% higher GPU clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 12.19W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 13.14 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 3.61 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron 3765U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 3765U

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 0.96 pt/$ vs 0.46 pt/$ More than 2x better performance per dollar
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,092 vs 547 Around 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Apr, 2015 vs Jan, 2015 Release date 3 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium N3700 vs Celeron 3765U

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium N3700  vs
Celeron 3765U 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.9 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 15W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 12.34 pt/W 6.87 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 12.19W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1

details

Pentium N3700  vs
Celeron 3765U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 1.9 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 400 MHz 300 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 16,384 MB
Intel Pentium N3700
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 3765U
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus