Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium N3700

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Pentium N3700

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium N3700

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium N3700

Report a correction
Much higher turbo clock speed 2.4 GHz vs None Compared to all cpus, 2.4 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 23.7 vs 20.3 More than 15% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Much better performance per watt 12.34 pt/W vs 2.34 pt/W More than 5.2x better performance per watt
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 14.63W 3x lower typical power consumption
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Aug, 2011 Release date over 3 years later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better PassMark score 1,863 vs 614 More than 3x better PassMark score
Lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 15.77 $/year 3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 4.34 $/year 3x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD E 300

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 300

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 41,900 MB/s vs 382.3 MB/s More than 109.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Higher GPU clock speed 488 MHz vs 400 MHz More than 20% higher GPU clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium N3700 vs E 300

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 300
896

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium N3700
382.3 MB/s
E 300
41,900 MB/s

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

E 300
20.3

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E 300
614

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium N3700  vs
E 300 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.3 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.4 GHz None
Cores Quad core Dual core
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1066

details

Pentium N3700  vs
E 300 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 6310
GPU clock speed 400 MHz 488 MHz

power consumption

TDP 6W 18W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 12.34 pt/W 2.34 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 14.63W
Intel Pentium N3700
Report a correction
AMD E 300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus