CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3520 vs 2020M

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), PassMark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Winner
Intel Pentium 2020M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium 2020M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Pentium 2020M

Intel Pentium 2020M

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium N3520

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium N3520

Report a correction
More l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly lower typical power consumption 6.09W vs 28.44W 4.7x lower typical power consumption
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly better performance per watt 40.97 pt/W vs 9.49 pt/W More than 4.2x better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 4.7x lower annual home energy cost
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Sep, 2012 Release date a year later
Front view of Intel Pentium 2020M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 2020M

Report a correction
Much higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 313 MHz More than 2x higher GPU clock speed
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 2.17 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Supports more RAM 32,768 MB vs 8,192 MB Supports 4x more RAM
Better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 854 MHz Around 30% better turbo clock speed
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,238 vs 513 Around 2.5x better PassMark (Single core) score
Better performance per dollar 2.48 pt/$ vs 1.91 pt/$ Around 30% better performance per dollar
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 2.17 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium N3520 vs 2020M

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy PassMark

PassMark (Single Core) Data courtesy PassMark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium N3520  vs
2020M 
Clock speed 2.17 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 7.5W 35W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 40.97 pt/W 9.49 pt/W
Typical power consumption 6.09W 28.44W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Pentium N3520  vs
2020M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.17 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 2.4 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 313 MHz 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed 854 MHz 1,100 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Pentium N3520
Report a correction
Intel Pentium 2020M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus