Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium N3510

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium N3510

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 6.09W vs 52.81W 8.7x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 8.7x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 8.7x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD A8 3560

Reasons to consider the
AMD A8 3560

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Pentium N3510  vs A8 3560 

L2 cache

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium N3510  vs
A8 3560 
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
3DNow!
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Pentium N3510  vs
A8 3560 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 7.5W 65W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year 56.94 $/year
Typical power consumption 6.09W 52.81W
Intel Pentium N3510
Report a correction
AMD A8 3560
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus